CMS Continues to Expand Vaccine Support to Long-Term Care Facilities

On May 13th, CMS released the latest in a series of rules intended to support the control of the spread of COVID-19 infections in long-term care (LTC) facilities and intermediate care facilities for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ICF-IID). The interim final rule with comment (IFC) went into effect on May 21st; however, CMS is accepting comments from interested stakeholders until July 12, 2021.

With the implementation of these new rules, CMS is requiring LTC facilities and ICF-IID to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that they offer residents and staff vaccination against COVID–19 when vaccine supplies are available. CMS is defining “staff” as those individuals working in the facility in a full-time capacity as well as those individuals who provide weekly services on-site. CMS chose not to extend this requirement to individuals who infrequently enter facilities -- such as service technicians, plumbers and others who may enter the facility only a few times each year. Facilities may choose to use a broader definition of staff to include these individuals and may choose to offer vaccination to these individuals.

In addition to providing vaccinations, CMS is also requiring that LTC facility and ICF-IID staff are educated about vaccination against COVID–19. CMS is using this IFC to encourage broader understanding of the benefits and risks of vaccination, as well as opportunities for vaccination. This broader understanding will allow staff to better educate facility residents and their families.

In the rule CMS also recognizes disparities in accessing quality care amongst certain subpopulations – specifically noting that these disparities have been exacerbated by the ongoing pandemic. CMS believes that educating all LTC and ICF-IID facility residents, clients and staff about COVID-19 vaccines will help to address some of these disparities.

Finally, CMS is requiring LTC facilities to report the vaccination status of all residents and staff weekly. CMS stops short of requiring ICF-IID to report the same information, citing the likely administrative and financial burden that a new reporting requirement could place on ICF-IID. CMS does however encourage ICF-IID to voluntarily report this information when feasible.

The full rule is available online.

For more information, please contact me at john@policypros.net

Comments

The Future of Liquid Biopsies: Endless Possibilities for Cancer Testing

Liquid biopsies are poised to disrupt cancer testing as we know it. These novel blood tests analyze circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and other molecules released by cancer cells, providing a non-invasive option for detection, diagnosis, and monitoring. The promise of liquid biopsies has generated tremendous excitement, along with over $1 billion in investments and acquisitions in recent years. But how close are we to realizing their full potential? A recent review article sounds a note of caution amidst the hype. While liquid biopsies show ability to detect cancer, evidence that they improve patient outcomes is still lacking. Randomized trials with survival endpoints are needed to prove clinical utility. However, this provides the perfect opportunity for innovative diagnostics companies. Rather than dampening enthusiasm, these evidence gaps highlight major growth possibilities if companies can demonstrate real-world value. We envision liquid biopsies transforming oncology...

The Problem of Limited-Supply Agreements for Medicare Price Negotiation

A recent JAMA Viewpoint article discusses how limited-supply agreements between brand name and generic drug makers could impact Medicare price negotiation under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). These agreements allow brand manufacturers to maintain some market exclusivity by limiting the supply of generic competitors. The article suggests these deals may increase as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implements the IRA's price negotiation provisions. From a business perspective, it's understandable why brand manufacturers might find limited-supply agreements preferable to having their drugs subject to Medicare negotiation. Maintaining even partial exclusivity is likely better for revenue than triggering government-dictated price reductions. However, policymakers and patients are increasingly concerned that these deals keep prices high despite generic availability. The use of limited supply agreements could also produce unintended consequences. Balancing som...

FDA Green Light Inches Genetic Screening Forward

The FDA recently granted authorization for the first multi-gene test for assessing hereditary cancer risk, marking a significant advancement in genetic screening capabilities. Developed by Invitae Corporation, the Invitae Common Hereditary Cancers Panel analyzes variants in 47 genes associated with increased cancer risk. Using next-generation sequencing on DNA from blood samples, the test looks at BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants linked to breast and ovarian cancer, as well as other cancer-related genes. (image source: Adobe Stock Images) The FDA’s approval provides a regulatory framework giving labs a clearer roadmap for developing similar multi-gene panels. With an authorized model in place, labs can proceed more confidently in navigating FDA submissions. Specifically, the de novo classification created for Invitae’s test allows future lab-developed panels to gain regulatory clearance through the expedited 510(k) pathway by demonstrating substantial equivalence. This streamlined validat...

The Health Policy War Room

Search This Blog