Skip to main content

CMS Releases Final New Technology Add-on Payment Decisions

On August 2, 2021, CMS placed on display at the Federal Register the final fiscal year 2022 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Final rule. Amongst the over 2,000 pages are CMS's final decisions on New Technology Add-on Payments (NTAP) for FY 2022.

The NTAP program was designed to identify new technologies and to ensure that payment under the IPPS would be adequate so that early adopters of  new technologies would not be financially disadvantaged. Under the traditional NTAP pathway, a technology must be considered "new",  the charges of cases involving the technology must be more than 75 percent of the unadjusted rate for the MS-DRG to which the technology is assigned, and the technology must represent a substantial clinical improvement over existing technologies. 

Beginning in 2021, CMS implemented an alternative NTAP pathway for technologies granted "break-through" approval by the FDA and for certain antimicrobial products. For this alternative pathway, technologies are assumed to meet both the "newness" criteria and the "substantial clinical improvement" criteria by the nature of their "break-through" approval status. These technologies must still meet the "cost" criteria.

CMS reviewed 26 NTAP applications under the traditional pathway. Nine were withdrawn by the applicant and one was not reviewed because the technology was not FDA approved by the deadline. CMS approved seven applications. Under the alternative pathway, CMS received 17 applications, reviewed 12, ultimately approving nine. These charts show the breakdown of the applications that CMS reviewed and of CMS's final payment determinations.



For more information about this rule, and about the NTAP process, contact me at john@policypros.net. The final FY 2022 rule is available for download here and will be published in the Federal Register on August 13, 2021.

John Warren is the owner and principal consultant at Gettysburg Healthcare Consulting. Located in Hanover, Pennsylvania. He focuses on issues affecting the Medicare program -- including coverage, coding, and reimbursement of diagnostic tests, prescription drugs and other Medicare covered services. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Problem of Limited-Supply Agreements for Medicare Price Negotiation

A recent JAMA Viewpoint article discusses how limited-supply agreements between brand name and generic drug makers could impact Medicare price negotiation under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). These agreements allow brand manufacturers to maintain some market exclusivity by limiting the supply of generic competitors. The article suggests these deals may increase as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implements the IRA's price negotiation provisions. From a business perspective, it's understandable why brand manufacturers might find limited-supply agreements preferable to having their drugs subject to Medicare negotiation. Maintaining even partial exclusivity is likely better for revenue than triggering government-dictated price reductions. However, policymakers and patients are increasingly concerned that these deals keep prices high despite generic availability. The use of limited supply agreements could also produce unintended consequences.  Balancing som...

The Future of Liquid Biopsies: Endless Possibilities for Cancer Testing

Liquid biopsies are poised to disrupt cancer testing as we know it. These novel blood tests analyze circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and other molecules released by cancer cells, providing a non-invasive option for detection, diagnosis, and monitoring. The promise of liquid biopsies has generated tremendous excitement, along with over $1 billion in investments and acquisitions in recent years. But how close are we to realizing their full potential?  A recent review article sounds a note of caution amidst the hype. While liquid biopsies show ability to detect cancer, evidence that they improve patient outcomes is still lacking. Randomized trials with survival endpoints are needed to prove clinical utility. However, this provides the perfect opportunity for innovative diagnostics companies. Rather than dampening enthusiasm, these evidence gaps highlight major growth possibilities if companies can demonstrate real-world value.   We envision liquid biopsies transforming oncology...

FDA Green Light Inches Genetic Screening Forward

The FDA recently granted authorization for the first multi-gene test for assessing hereditary cancer risk, marking a significant advancement in genetic screening capabilities. Developed by Invitae Corporation, the Invitae Common Hereditary Cancers Panel analyzes variants in 47 genes associated with increased cancer risk. Using next-generation sequencing on DNA from blood samples, the test looks at BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants linked to breast and ovarian cancer, as well as other cancer-related genes.  (image source: Adobe Stock Images) The FDA’s approval provides a regulatory framework giving labs a clearer roadmap for developing similar multi-gene panels. With an authorized model in place, labs can proceed more confidently in navigating FDA submissions. Specifically, the de novo classification created for Invitae’s test allows future lab-developed panels to gain regulatory clearance through the expedited 510(k) pathway by demonstrating substantial equivalence. This streamlined validat...