HHS Starts the Drug Price Negotiation Process

Earlier this week, HHS issued a press release announcing key dates for the first year of the Medicare drug price negotiation process. The Inflation Reduction Act provided Medicare with the authority to negotiate prices for a select number of prescription drugs. These negotiated prices will go into effect in 2026.

HHS and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have committed to providing the opportunity for stakeholders to be engaged in the negotiation process by providing the opportunity for public feedback collection.

According to CMS, they will be actively soliciting feedback on areas including:

Terms and conditions contained in the manufacturer agreement, including the manufacturer’s and Secretary’s responsibilities.
Approach for considering

the manufacturer-reported data elements and
evidence about alternative treatments.

Process for the offer and counteroffer exchange between the Secretary and manufacturers.
Content of an explanation for the maximum fair price.
Method for applying the maximum fair price across different dosage forms and strengths of a selected drug.
Dispute resolution process for specific issues that are not exempt from administrative and judicial review under section 1198.
Processes for compliance monitoring and imposition of civil monetary penalties for violations.

Additionally, CMS announced a number of key dates in 2023 and beyond.

Details of this process will be hammered out over the next several months as CMS is expected to issue guidance documents proposing the more specific details of this program.

Drug makers should follow this process closely and take the opportunity to become heard as CMS works out the specifics of a process that is expected to lower the costs of prescription drugs for Medicare beneficiars.

Comments

Selecting Therapeutic Alternatives: A Critical Perspective for Drug Manufacturers

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 instructed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to initiate drug price negotiations with manufacturers for the first time. A key component of these negotiations involves considering factors like the drug's benefits and costs to establish a "lowest maximum fair price." (MFP) For drug manufacturers, CMS’s process for making comparisons of therapeutic alternative(s) to determine the MFP raises a number of crucial questions. The IRA's guidance suggests that CMS will initially compare drugs within the same class as the negotiated drug to determine a starting point for pricing. For drug manufacturers, this approach raises concerns regarding price competition within drug classes. As new drugs are often priced in line with preexisting brand-name drugs in the same class, the negotiation process may result in downward pressure on prices for all drugs in the class. This could significantly affect the revenue and profitabi...

TCET Pathway Could Accelerate Access to Innovating Technologies

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed the Transitional Coverage for Emerging Technologies (TCET) pathway to enable quicker coverage decisions for breakthrough devices needing accelerated regulatory review. As described in JAMA Health Forum, TCET allows tailored oversight based on an innovation’s specific benefits and risks. TCET focuses on FDA Breakthrough-designated devices for serious conditions supported by limited clinical data for market authorization. By facilitating transitional coverage, TCET aims to help make cutting-edge technologies accessible to patients while additional real-world evidence is gathered to meet CMS’ “reasonable and necessary” standard. For developers to optimize TCET’s streamlined approach they should be sure to: - Pursue FDA Breakthrough designation when criteria are met. This opens the TCET pathway. - Engage CMS early on study designs and evidence needs. Incorporate draft guidance on endpoints and real-world data....

Bridging the Gap: The Long Road from FDA Approval to Medicare Coverage

A new study published in JAMA Health Forum reveals that the road to Medicare coverage for novel medical technologies is a long and winding one. Researchers found that only 44% of innovative devices and diagnostics approved by the FDA from 2016-2019 had even “nominal” Medicare coverage by 2022. This data highlights major hurdles in the system that delay patient access to beneficial emerging technologies. About the Research The study examined 281 novel products cleared through the FDA from 2016-2019 via the high-risk premarket approval, de novo, and breakthrough 510(k) pathways. These included things like groundbreaking diagnostic tests, implantable devices, and other innovative treatment technologies. The goal was to measure how long it took to establish national or regional Medicare coverage policies for these newly approved products. This is important because Medicare coverage is required before hospitals, physicians and patients can reliably access new technologies. Key Findings The ...

The Health Policy War Room

Search This Blog