Skip to main content

Innovative Models for Lowering Drug Spending

Recently, much has been written about the escalating costs of drug prices in the US. Increasing drug prices are present challenges to those who struggle with affordability and access to their medications. The Inflation Reduction Act brought changes to the way the Medicare program reimburses for prescription drugs. Last year, President Biden challenged the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to develop and test new payment models that can support value-based payments and promote high-quality healthcare.




CMMI has recently proposed three models intended to improve affordability and access to drugs as well as measuring the feasibility of implementation. 

    1. The Medicare High-Value Drug List Model

Under this model, Part D plans would be encouraged to offer a low, fixed co-payment across all cost-sharing phases of the Part D drug benefit for a standardized Medicare list of generic drugs that treat chronic conditions. Patients picking plans that participate in the Model will have more certainty that their out-of-pocket costs for these generic drugs will be capped at a maximum of $2 per month per drug.

    2.The Cell and Gene Therapy Access Model

This model would have CMS coordinate and administer multi-state, outcomes-based agreements with manufacturers for certain cell and gene therapies (CGT). These agreements could take the form of partial up-front payment for CGT with the remainder based on clinical milestones, risk-based payment where manufacturers pay rebates if clinical outcomes are missed or payments spread over time and based on continued achievement of clinical outcomes. As new therapies come to market, this will help Medicaid beneficiaries gain access to potentially life-changing, high-cost specialty drugs for illnesses like sickle cell disease and cancer.

    3. The Accelerating Clinical Evidence Model

Allowing CMS to develop payment methods for drugs approved under accelerated approval, in consultation with the Food and Drug Administration, is the goal of this model. Encouraging timely confirmatory trial completion and improving access to post-market safety and efficacy data has the potential to reduce Medicare spending on drugs that have no confirmed clinical benefit.

These models are all in their preliminary stages and CMMI plans to further develop and test each of these models. They have committed to engaging with stakeholders, including beneficiary and caregiver advocacy groups, manufacturers, health insurers, health care providers, academic institutions and researchers, and other interested parties for feedback and input.

Read the full CMMI report here: https://innovation.cms.gov/data-and-reports/2023/eo-rx-drug-cost-response-report



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Selecting Therapeutic Alternatives: A Critical Perspective for Drug Manufacturers

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 instructed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to initiate drug price negotiations with manufacturers for the first time. A key component of these negotiations involves considering factors like the drug's benefits and costs to establish a "lowest maximum fair price." (MFP) For drug manufacturers, CMS’s process for making comparisons of therapeutic alternative(s) to determine the MFP raises a number of crucial questions. The IRA's guidance suggests that CMS will initially compare drugs within the same class as the negotiated drug to determine a starting point for pricing. For drug manufacturers, this approach raises concerns regarding price competition within drug classes. As new drugs are often priced in line with preexisting brand-name drugs in the same class, the negotiation process may result in downward pressure on prices for all drugs in the class. This could significantly affect the revenue and profitabi...

TCET Pathway Could Accelerate Access to Innovating Technologies

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed the Transitional Coverage for Emerging Technologies (TCET) pathway to enable quicker coverage decisions for breakthrough devices needing accelerated regulatory review. As described in JAMA Health Forum, TCET allows tailored oversight based on an innovation’s specific benefits and risks. TCET focuses on FDA Breakthrough-designated devices for serious conditions supported by limited clinical data for market authorization. By facilitating transitional coverage, TCET aims to help make cutting-edge technologies accessible to patients while additional real-world evidence is gathered to meet CMS’ “reasonable and necessary” standard.  For developers to optimize TCET’s streamlined approach they should be sure to: - Pursue FDA Breakthrough designation when criteria are met. This opens the TCET pathway.   - Engage CMS early on study designs and evidence needs. Incorporate draft guidance on endpoints and real-world data....

Bridging the Gap: The Long Road from FDA Approval to Medicare Coverage

A new study published in JAMA Health Forum reveals that the road to Medicare coverage for novel medical technologies is a long and winding one. Researchers found that only 44% of innovative devices and diagnostics approved by the FDA from 2016-2019 had even “nominal” Medicare coverage by 2022. This data highlights major hurdles in the system that delay patient access to beneficial emerging technologies. About the Research The study examined 281 novel products cleared through the FDA from 2016-2019 via the high-risk premarket approval, de novo, and breakthrough 510(k) pathways. These included things like groundbreaking diagnostic tests, implantable devices, and other innovative treatment technologies. The goal was to measure how long it took to establish national or regional Medicare coverage policies for these newly approved products. This is important because Medicare coverage is required before hospitals, physicians and patients can reliably access new technologies. Key Findings The ...